<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for notabilia.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notabilia.us/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notabilia.us/blog</link>
	<description>occasional musings on things of interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MediaWiki and Genealogy by Michael</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/mediawiki-and-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=16#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>If you want to use MediaWiki for genealogy, go with http://semantic-mediawiki.org.  In combination with the Semantic Forms extension, you could make a nice genealogy site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to use MediaWiki for genealogy, go with <a href="http://semantic-mediawiki.org" rel="nofollow">http://semantic-mediawiki.org</a>.  In combination with the Semantic Forms extension, you could make a nice genealogy site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MediaWiki and Genealogy by Albert</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/mediawiki-and-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=16#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>Same remark as Todd. Am considering using a Mediawiki for a collaborative family tree. I see you seem to have stayed with phpgedview. Have you tried moving it to a Mediawiki? What was your experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same remark as Todd. Am considering using a Mediawiki for a collaborative family tree. I see you seem to have stayed with phpgedview. Have you tried moving it to a Mediawiki? What was your experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Rapidly Add Twitter Followers by How to get hundreds of twitters followers for free and follow them back automatically &#124; Accumulator of desired abundance</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/how-to-rapidly-add-twitter-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>How to get hundreds of twitters followers for free and follow them back automatically &#124; Accumulator of desired abundance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=44#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Rapidly Add Twitter Followers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Rapidly Add Twitter Followers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A High-frequency sound in a T tunnel? by Michael White</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/a-high-frequency-sound-in-a-t-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-3463</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=33#comment-3463</guid>
		<description>I later decided it was just my ears popping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I later decided it was just my ears popping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kurzweil&#8217;s Sixth Epoch: Waking Up the Universe by Yorick</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/kurzweils-sixth-epoch-waking-up-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=84#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>One other possibility:

o The Singularity cannot be reached

We do not understand how consciousness works. It&#039;d be rash to state that we will understand it by such-and-such a date, or that we will positively be able to create it through technology, or that such technologically created people (conscious entities, whatever you wish to call them) will outstrip human intelligence exponentially.

There are just too many unknowns. Maybe machines really cannot become conscious. Maybe if they can become conscious, it turns out that being able to find prime numbers really fast and being able to increase one&#039;s intelligence are two very, very different things. Maybe machines that become conscious just want to watch (virtual) reality TV, and that&#039;s why the Singularity never occurs.

Maybe we&#039;ll find out eventually. That&#039;d be fun. In the meantime, keep making those robots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other possibility:</p>
<p>o The Singularity cannot be reached</p>
<p>We do not understand how consciousness works. It&#8217;d be rash to state that we will understand it by such-and-such a date, or that we will positively be able to create it through technology, or that such technologically created people (conscious entities, whatever you wish to call them) will outstrip human intelligence exponentially.</p>
<p>There are just too many unknowns. Maybe machines really cannot become conscious. Maybe if they can become conscious, it turns out that being able to find prime numbers really fast and being able to increase one&#8217;s intelligence are two very, very different things. Maybe machines that become conscious just want to watch (virtual) reality TV, and that&#8217;s why the Singularity never occurs.</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;ll find out eventually. That&#8217;d be fun. In the meantime, keep making those robots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Textbooks on the Horizon? by Ronald</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/e-textbooks-on-the-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=26#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>If you are lucky enough to be a genealogist, you are lucky enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are lucky enough to be a genealogist, you are lucky enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Facebook Bad? by Jess</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/is-facebook-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=72#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting article. Facebook is not true interaction and can be overly used by people who show signs of social anxiety.
I recently broke up from a 5 year relationship, so I have lost contact with a large group of mutual friends. I also lost alot of my self esteme in the process. I have spent alot of my time on facebook during this time and its been excessive. I have been using as a false sense of security that I have people around when really, the cyber world...is not the REAL world. I felt safe interacting with people from the comfort of my own home when that is not a healthy thing. I always felt so down reading and living vicariously through other ppls social lives...pretty sad hey. But I know im not the only one that has gone through this. I have stepped away and outta my house and now push my self to engage in face to face sociaising. Life has been great.
 Its so easy for some to be sucked into this trap. Eeeek. Its scary where the future of our generation is headed. Human connection is important for stability, growth and enjoyment in our lives... you cant get meaningfull connection through a computer screen. I have vowed only to use facebook to communicate with family and friends who live to far away to visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting article. Facebook is not true interaction and can be overly used by people who show signs of social anxiety.<br />
I recently broke up from a 5 year relationship, so I have lost contact with a large group of mutual friends. I also lost alot of my self esteme in the process. I have spent alot of my time on facebook during this time and its been excessive. I have been using as a false sense of security that I have people around when really, the cyber world&#8230;is not the REAL world. I felt safe interacting with people from the comfort of my own home when that is not a healthy thing. I always felt so down reading and living vicariously through other ppls social lives&#8230;pretty sad hey. But I know im not the only one that has gone through this. I have stepped away and outta my house and now push my self to engage in face to face sociaising. Life has been great.<br />
 Its so easy for some to be sucked into this trap. Eeeek. Its scary where the future of our generation is headed. Human connection is important for stability, growth and enjoyment in our lives&#8230; you cant get meaningfull connection through a computer screen. I have vowed only to use facebook to communicate with family and friends who live to far away to visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kurzweil&#8217;s Sixth Epoch: Waking Up the Universe by Jack</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/kurzweils-sixth-epoch-waking-up-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=84#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>The implications of self-improving AI were explored by Isaac Asimov in the fifties and probably by others even earlier. It doesn&#039;t originate with Kurzweil. Seriously, I can&#039;t understand what people see in this guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The implications of self-improving AI were explored by Isaac Asimov in the fifties and probably by others even earlier. It doesn&#8217;t originate with Kurzweil. Seriously, I can&#8217;t understand what people see in this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube Scrobbler GreaseMonkey Script by Tim</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/youtube-scrobbler-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=70#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>I have a problem in that when I say play one track using the YT scrobbler.. my last.fm profile page shows using Youtube Scrobbler.. but when I start
playing music from WMP 11 and the notification should change it is still showing listening using Youtube Scrobbler.. I tried disabling greasemonkey
but after 8 tracks from Windows Media Player 11 I still see listening using Youtube Scrobbler.. is this a bug with last.fm or with the scrobbler itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem in that when I say play one track using the YT scrobbler.. my last.fm profile page shows using Youtube Scrobbler.. but when I start<br />
playing music from WMP 11 and the notification should change it is still showing listening using Youtube Scrobbler.. I tried disabling greasemonkey<br />
but after 8 tracks from Windows Media Player 11 I still see listening using Youtube Scrobbler.. is this a bug with last.fm or with the scrobbler itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MediaWiki and Genealogy by Todd</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/mediawiki-and-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=16#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>I found your website googling this as well.  I&#039;d like to maintain my own little mediawiki for my family name and keep it more controlled by only allowing relatives in to collaborate.  I wish there was a mediawiki plugin that would import and export GEDCOM data.  I get GEDCOM is not that standard as different implementers don’t always comply with the standard.  Still, it would be real helpful to have a that and a mediawiki template for people.  Let me know if you guys want to attempt to develop it collaboratively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your website googling this as well.  I&#8217;d like to maintain my own little mediawiki for my family name and keep it more controlled by only allowing relatives in to collaborate.  I wish there was a mediawiki plugin that would import and export GEDCOM data.  I get GEDCOM is not that standard as different implementers don’t always comply with the standard.  Still, it would be real helpful to have a that and a mediawiki template for people.  Let me know if you guys want to attempt to develop it collaboratively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MediaWiki and Genealogy by john</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/mediawiki-and-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=16#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>Have you made any progress on your decision?  I have also been researching this question and have been doing a trial run with Semantic Mediawiki, Forms, templates, etc.  I am currently of the opinion that this will be a very good solution, but there are still some things to work out (family trees, for instance - although Semantic Result Formats seems to be a good candidate).

I&#039;d be happy to share more details with you if you are interested.

Regards,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you made any progress on your decision?  I have also been researching this question and have been doing a trial run with Semantic Mediawiki, Forms, templates, etc.  I am currently of the opinion that this will be a very good solution, but there are still some things to work out (family trees, for instance &#8211; although Semantic Result Formats seems to be a good candidate).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to share more details with you if you are interested.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resolutions by January 2009 Resolution at Richard Mondello</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/resolutions/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>January 2009 Resolution at Richard Mondello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=41#comment-498</guid>
		<description>[...] by my friend Michael White, I&#8217;m realizing that I don&#8217;t read enough anymore. It bothers me, so I hope to read for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by my friend Michael White, I&#8217;m realizing that I don&#8217;t read enough anymore. It bothers me, so I hope to read for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Joe Wurzelbacher Related to Charles Keating? by Christian Quill &#187; Is Joe Wurzelbacher Related to Charles Keating?</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/is-joe-wurzelbacher-related-to-charles-keating/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Quill &#187; Is Joe Wurzelbacher Related to Charles Keating?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=38#comment-426</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original post:  Is Joe Wurzelbacher Related to Charles Keating? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original post:  Is Joe Wurzelbacher Related to Charles Keating? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A De Facto National Popular Vote in 2008 by Markus Schober</title>
		<link>http://notabilia.us/blog/a-de-facto-national-popular-vote-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Schober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notabilia.us/blog/?p=23#comment-73</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T APOLOGIZE (FOR WORK YOU&#039;VE DONE)!

I haven&#039;t gotten too far into it, but it really is quite good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T APOLOGIZE (FOR WORK YOU&#8217;VE DONE)!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten too far into it, but it really is quite good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
